新唐

体彩助力添活力 济源全民健身掀热潮_我的网站

A |     晨曦微露，济源世纪广场体彩主题健身公园已然活力满满：老年人在健身器材上舒展筋骨，年轻人在“乐小星” 主题篮球场上尽情驰骋；望春园内，经过升级改造的健身步道上晨跑者步履轻快，羽毛球场上来来回回，球影翻飞。    

    Liberia-flagged vessel Front Eagle Photo: Courtesy of China's Supreme People's Court Guangzhou Maritime Court recently successfully mediated a 180 million yuan ($25 million) dispute arising from a collision between two oil tankers in waters near the Strait of Hormuz, with both parties agreeing to apply Chinese law and submit their dispute to the Chinese court, the Global Times learned from the court on Sunday.
In 2025, two crude oil tankers collided at the eastern entrance to the Strait of Hormuz, 24 nautical miles off Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, media reported.
Owned by oil tanker operator Frontline, the Liberia-flagged vessel Front Eagle collided with the Antigua and Barbuda-flagged vessel Adalynn on the morning of June 17, 2025.
The Adalynn was damaged in the fire. While the Front Eagle was undergoing repairs in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong Province, Global Shipping Holding Ltd., which owns the Adalynn, applied to Guangzhou Maritime Court for its arrest. Frontline provided a cash security of 203 million yuan to release the arrest and applied to establish a limitation fund for maritime claims.
The court approved the application and allowed Frontline to establish the limitation fund, setting the amount of the fund at 168 million yuan.
Guangzhou Maritime Court held four pretrial conferences on October 11, 2025, January 12, May 6 and July 13, 2026 to complete preparations for evidence examination, technical investigations and reported the relevant pretrial arrangements to the provincial high court, the Global Times learned from the court. 
The court held a public hearing for the case on July 14, 2026.
No government agency had conducted an investigation into the collision, and no official findings were issued after the accident. Taking into account the unique burden-of-proof challenges in maritime collision disputes, Guangzhou Maritime Court took measures to preserve key evidence when handling the vessel arrest, including navigation logs, AIS data, voyage data recorder (VDR) records and CCTV footage, the court told the Global Times in a statement on Sunday.
Under a process that involves exchanging evidence inventories, sealing materials simultaneously and jointly reviewing them after evidence submissions, the court helped ensure the authenticity of critical records and laid the groundwork for determining the facts of the case.
As the two sides and their respective maritime experts reached sharply different conclusions over liability, the court introduced a maritime technical investigator mechanism, with the consent of both parties, allowing technical experts to participate throughout the proceedings. Drawing on the preserved evidence, investigators reconstructed the collision, assessed the vessels' encounter situation and clarified the parties' respective responsibilities.
Following the hearing, the court facilitated mediation, and the two parties reached a settlement agreement on July 27, 2026. On July 31, the court organized the distribution of the maritime liability limitation fund among creditors involved in the foreign vessel collision dispute and related charter-party disputes. 
Representatives of the Adalynn traveled from overseas to the court to present a letter of appreciation and a commemorative banner in recognition of the court's efforts, according to the court statement. 
After the Guangzhou Maritime Court accepted the case, both parties agreed to apply Chinese law to establish a maritime liability limitation fund and resolve their substantive dispute, breaking away from the long-standing reliance of international shipping disputes on European and US courts and legal systems.
Choice of justice 
Bilov Viacheslav, a representative of Global Shipping Holding Ltd., told the Global Times that the main reason they chose a Chinese court to mediate the case is that "we want absolutely fair, unbiased approach to this issue. Because nowadays in this world, there are some countries which believe that they are authorized to give instruction to all others, which definitely is having influence on the decisions of the judge on the approach to the case."
Viacheslav gave the Chinese court's handling of the case a five-star rating, saying he had expected the dispute to take at least three years to resolve, but the Chinese court settled it within just one year. He also praised the judges and lawyers for their commitment to advancing the case throughout the proceedings.
"The judges and lawyers worked to advance the case with the same level of commitment as I did, even though the case directly concerned my own interests. This left a deep impression on me about litigation in China," Viacheslav said.
The case involved two foreign parties and a collision that occurred near the Strait of Hormuz, with no direct connection to China or Guangzhou Maritime Court initially. The fact that the parties chose to seek vessel arrest in China and agreed to apply Chinese law demonstrates the credibility and appeal of China's maritime judicial system, Wu Guining, vice president of the Guangzhou Maritime Court, who served as the presiding judge of the case, told the Global Times. 
The court also introduced a maritime technical investigator mechanism in the case, an innovation aimed at addressing complex technical issues arising from vessel collision accidents, Wu said, noting that through technical investigations, the court was able to establish the facts of the case more efficiently, highlighting the integration of professional maritime investigation capabilities with China's specialized maritime adjudication system.
The case demonstrates China's ability to handle major, complex and cross-border maritime disputes with professional expertise, Wu said.
The handling of the collision between the two vessels is just one example of how Chinese courts have been dealing with a growing number of foreign-related maritime cases in recent years.
The Global Times learned from China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) in October last year that over the past 40 years, Chinese courts have handled a total of 88,000 foreign-related maritime cases involving parties from 146 countries and regions.
At a lecture held by the SPC on Friday, Shen Hongyu, director of the Fourth Civil Division of the SPC, told the Global Times that in recent years, Chinese courts have become more influential in participating in and promoting global ocean governance reform. Maritime justice serves as an important instrument for practicing the vision of a maritime community with a shared future and for advancing the reform of the global ocean governance system. 
。两座体彩主题公园遥相呼应，依托体彩公益金落地的健身阵地，让市民在家门口就能畅快运动、乐享健身之乐。体彩支持，健身更便捷　　在望春园，河南体彩济源分中心筹措发行经费，支持园区健身空间完成全面升级。崭新的健身步道、标准羽毛球场投入使用，配套路标、休闲石凳、照明路灯等便民设施一应俱全。如今焕然一新的场地，收获了大家一致好评。“这个羽毛球场使用十几年了，以前地面凹凸不平，不少打球的人不小心扭伤脚踝。体彩翻新了场地，真是为咱们老百姓办了件实实在在的好事。

B | ” 常年在此锻炼的李先生感慨道。

　　世纪广场西北侧的中国体育彩票主题健身公园，则盘活闲置空地，打造充满青春气息的“乐小星” 主题篮球场，色彩明快、富有活力，为周边青少年和篮球爱好者提供了专业舒适的运动场地。篮球场采用环保材料铺设，场地标线清晰，与园内绿植相得益彰，既确保运动安全，又营造出愉悦的锻炼氛围。放学后和周末，这里成为孩子们挥洒汗水的一方乐土。“球场修得很好，离家也近，孩子放学就能来打球，特别方便。”一位陪孩子锻炼的家长如是说。

　　公园内设置体彩公益宣传栏，图文并茂解读中国体育彩票“来之于民，用之于民”发行宗旨。

C | 市民休闲健身的同时，直观了解一座座运动场、一套套健身设施背后的公益力量，真切感受体彩温度与社会责任。体彩助力，全民健身成效显著　　济源两座体彩主题公园的建设，只是体彩助力全民健身的一个缩影。数据显示，2025年济源体育场地总数达3565个，人均体育场地面积2.86平方米，城市社区10分钟健身圈实现全覆盖，经常参加体育锻炼人数比例达到44.3%。承留花石健身步道、思礼健康步道等一批户外健身打卡点广受市民喜爱。各村（社区、公园）公共体育设施免费开放，篮球城等场馆推行分时段免费、低收费开放，持续拓宽群众健身空间。　　赛事活动方面，济源充分利用体彩公益金，持续丰富群众赛事供给，先后举办新春全民健身系列活动、河南省社区运动会等各类赛事，涵盖篮球、排球、足球、太极拳等多个项目。从城市社区到乡村广场，体彩支持的全民健身赛事活动遍地开花，让“我运动、我健康、我快乐”的理念深入人心。　　从社区里一套崭新的健身器材，到城市中的运动公园；从日常健身阵地建设，到丰富多彩的群众体育赛事，体彩公益金持续扎根山城大地，将“来之于民，用之于民”的公益初心落到群众身边。　　每一笔体彩公益金投入，都是为健康中国建设添砖加瓦；每一次市民在运动场挥洒汗水，都是体彩公益力量最鲜活的回响。中国体育彩票持续以责任传递温暖，点亮每一处热爱运动的角落，让健康幸福的生活方式触手可及。

Current article:http://alq.foujiongwenruapoumeizhan.buzz/list_c22v3/4py.html

Published on:21:04:39